The lamest case against social media EVER

Sub-title: We’re different. And that’s why we love each other

While many of us would rather do without our earlobes than give up Tweeting, every once in a while I can’t help but face the fact that there are stragglers among us; people who will fight to the end before admitting to the efficiencies of social media.

And although it pains me to admit this – both to myself and out loud – one such warrior is Greg.

I can hear the gasps of shock from here. Yes, my very own boyfriend refuses to have anything to do with a seamless source of breaking news, inspiration, entertainment and community.

Seamless?

Yes, of course!

While the coffee perks in the morning, I check out the latest in global news and local gossip. (It’s important to know what’s going on in the world.)

Waiting in line at the grocery store is no longer a point of frustration. It’s an opportunity to touch base and find out what others are up to. (Clearly a great stress buster.)

And how do you think I found out about Whitney Houston’s recent death? (R.I.P. Whitney.)

If you’re anyone EXCEPT Greg, you know what I’m talking about.

And yet a recent conversation made me realize that Greg will NEVER join us in the 21st Century.

Me: Why don’t you just try it?

Greg: I DON’T WANT to try it. I’m not interested and I don’t think it’s good for relationships!

Me: Um. WHAT?!!!

Greg: Twitter . . . Facebook . . . they open the door to adultery.

Me: You’re crazy.

Greg: Admit it. Talking to people on Facebook leads to cheating.

Me: I’d agree with you but then we’d both be wrong. Why is social media any different than talking to the pharmacist or the waitress or the gas attendant?

Greg: Social media? Who said anything about social media? We’re talking about Twitter and Facebook.

Me: You have no idea what you’re talking about, do you?

Greg: Of course I do! You’re the one who’s bringing your work into this with words like “social media” – and you KNOW I don’t understand your work.

Me: Okay. You’re right. I’m just trying to confuse you.

PS. I mean seriously. How do I argue with that?